Re: Are the rich & powerful more fit & deserving than the poor?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Tom Boland: "Beggars on London streets -- give or not give?/Usenet thread"
• Previous message: g. nelson: "Re: Are the rich & powerful more fit & deserving than the poor? FWD"

On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, g. nelson wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, Tom Boland wrote:
> 
> > The short article below defines Social Darwinism's basic premise as this:
> > 
> > "Wealthy and powerful people have attained their status because they are
> > smarter and more socially 'fit' than poor people."
> > 
> > How would you reply to such an argument? -- Tom
> 
> Dan Quayle.
> 
> (sorry, I could not resist...)
> 


imagine this space filled to brim with hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
hahahahahahahahahahah.......

ROTFLMAO!!!  Grrl, that was the best laugh I've had in **months**

SAving to hard drive...GREAT!!! SROTFL...   pat  hahahahahah......gaaasp!


*********************************
You've got to dance like nobody's 
               watching, and love 
                  like it's never
                    going to hurt.

• Next message: Tom Boland: "Beggars on London streets -- give or not give?/Usenet thread"
• Previous message: g. nelson: "Re: Are the rich & powerful more fit & deserving than the poor? FWD"