Government Programs Reduce Poverty: CBPP Study FWD

Tom Boland (
Mon, 25 May 1998 10:17:43 -0700 (PDT)

FWD  For more information, write to <>
For the full 200K report go to


A new analysis of Census data finds that Social Security reduces the
proportion of elderly living in poverty from 50 percent to about 12 percent
and lifts 12 million elderly people out of poverty, while the Earned Income
Tax Credit - a tax credit for low-income working families - now lifts more
children out of poverty than any other government program.

Strengths of the Safety Net, by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities,
also finds the impact of government benefit programs in reducing poverty
weakened modestly in 1996, especially among children. The study identifies
this as a key reason the poverty rate failed to drop in 1996 despite
economic growth.

Even so, the report found, government benefit programs have a large effect
in reducing poverty. The incomes that families received through the private
economy left 57.5 million people below the poverty line in 1996, the study
reported. Government benefit programs lifted 27 million of these 57.5
million people out of poverty, cutting poverty nearly in half.

"An array of programs, led by Social Security, are having strong effects in
reducing poverty," said Wendell Primus, the Center's director of income
security and co-author of the study. "Without Social Security, poverty
among the elderly would be widespread."

Primus noted that in the absence of Social Security and other government
benefits, one of every two elderly people would have fallen below the
poverty line in 1996. Primarily because of Social Security, fewer than one
in 10 elderly Americans was poor that year.

Primus added that an examination of these data over time also shows that
when government benefit programs have been strengthened, they have lifted
larger proportions of people out of poverty, while fewer people have been
lifted out when - as in 1996 - the programs have weakened.

Study Counts Certain Non-Cash Benefits and Taxes

The study uses unpublished Census data to compare the number of people with
incomes below the poverty line before receipt of government benefits to
those left in poverty after government benefits are counted. The difference
reflects the number of people the safety net programs remove from poverty.

The study follows the recommendations of a 1995 National Academy of
Sciences panel in counting certain non-cash benefits such as food stamps
and housing assistance as part of income and in reflecting the effects on
income of federal income and payroll taxes and the Earned Income Tax
Credit. As a result, the study's measure of poverty after government
benefits are counted shows somewhat lower poverty rates than the official
Census Bureau poverty measure, which excludes non-cash benefits and the
EITC and measures before-tax rather than after-tax income.

Programs Cut Poverty Nearly in Half

In 1996, the study found, 57.5 million people - 21.6 percent of the U.S.
population - had incomes below the poverty line before receipt of
government benefits. After government benefits are taken into account, the
number remaining in poverty was reduced to 30.5 million people, or 11.5
percent of the population. The study also found that government benefit
programs reduce the depth of poverty - the degree to which families'
incomes fall below the poverty line before receipt of government benefits -
by two-thirds.

The study found that government benefit programs, sometimes referred to as
safety net programs, have their most striking effects on the elderly. Some
50.1 percent of the elderly population would have been poor in 1996 in the
absence of government benefits, the study reported. Government benefit
programs lowered the elderly poverty rate to 9.2 percent.

The strong effect of government benefits in reducing poverty among the
elderly is due overwhelmingly to Social Security. In 1996, Social Security
was responsible for nine of every 10 elderly people lifted out of poverty
by government benefit programs. The safety net programs lifted a total 13
million elderly people out of poverty, with Social Security responsible for
lifting out 11.7 million of these 13 million people.

Effect on Children Substantially Smaller

Government benefits lift from poverty more than four of every five elderly
people who otherwise would be poor, the study found, but fewer than one in
three children who otherwise would be poor. In 1996, government benefit
programs lowered the child poverty rate from 23.6 percent before receipt of
government benefits to 16.1 percent after receipt of benefits.

The Earned Income Tax Credit, expanded under Presidents Reagan, Bush and
Clinton, emerged in 1996 as the single program removing the largest number
of children from poverty, the study reported. The EITC, which offsets some
or all of federal income and payroll taxes and, in many cases, also
provides a wage supplement to low-income working families, lifted 4.6
million people - including 2.4 million children - from poverty in 1996.

Although the EITC has the largest effect in lifting children out of
poverty, cash assistance and food and housing programs have a larger impact
than the EITC in diminishing the severity of poverty among children. Many
of the children whose families receive cash assistance are so poor that
this aid renders them less poor rather than lifting them above the poverty

Since the EITC is available only to working families, its effects on
children in those families are especially strong, the study found. Among
working families, the EITC has a larger effect than any other program or
category of programs both in reducing the number of poor children and in
reducing the severity of poverty among those who remain poor.

The EITC's effects are largest in the South, the region in which wages tend
to be lowest and the proportion of working families with poverty-level
incomes is highest. Nearly half of all children in the South who were
lifted out of poverty by government benefit programs were raised from
poverty by the EITC.

Weakening of the Safety Net for Children

The study found that despite the strengthened effects of the EITC in 1996,
government benefits lifted out of poverty a smaller percentage of children
who would otherwise have been poor than in the previous year. Overall, the
benefit programs lifted about 400,000 fewer children from poverty in 1996
than in 1995.

This decline in the impact of the programs, while modest, was sufficient to
prevent the child poverty rate, as well as the overall poverty rate, from
dropping. Between 1995 and 1996, the poverty rate for children before
receipt of government benefits declined modestly, reflecting improvements
in the economy. But after receipt of government benefits, the child poverty
rate remained essentially unchanged between the two years. The negative
effect of a weakening safety net offset the positive effect of a growing
economy, the study found.

>From 1995 to 1996, the number of children receiving cash public assistance
benefits fell 600,000, while the number receiving food stamps fell about
700,000. Improvement in the economy can explain only part of these
declines, the study said. It noted that among children who were poor before
receipt of government benefits, the proportions receiving public assistance
and food stamps fell in 1996.

The welfare law enacted in August 1996 was not a major reason for this
decline, according to the study, as few of the legislation's major impacts
were felt that year. Many states already had policies in place that were
causing caseloads to drop.

The study explained that with these state efforts continuing and the
welfare law taking effect, the decline in the number of children receiving
food stamps and cash public assistance became sharper in 1997, with the
number of children receiving these benefits falling by much larger amounts
than can be attributed to continued economic growth. This suggests the
proportions of poor children receiving these forms of assistance are likely
to have fallen significantly in 1997 and that the safety net's effect in
reducing child poverty could be weakening further. Poverty data for 1997
will be available later this year.

New Trend Could Reverse Long-term Pattern

This developing trend of a weakening safety net for families with children
could begin to reverse a decade-long pattern. The Center's report compares
the effects of government programs on poverty in 1987 and 1996, two similar
points in the business cycle. During this period, significant changes in
safety net programs occurred. In the years prior to enactment of the welfare
law, the EITC expanded, more low-income disabled children became eligible
for SSI, and food stamp benefits were improved. As a result, despite the
modest weakening of the safety net between 1995 and 1996, government
benefit programs still had a greater impact in reducing poverty in 1996
than in 1987.

But if safety net programs reduced poverty more than in 1996 then in 1987,
the economy had a smaller impact. The poverty rate as measured before
receipt of government benefits - the measure that reflects the impact of
the economy by itself - was actually higher in 1996 than in 1987, even
though the unemployment rate was significantly lower.

"Despite remarkable progress in reducing unemployment, the economy is
performing less well than in previous recoveries in lifting people out of
poverty," study co-author Kathryn Porter said. "As a result, the role of
the safety net in reducing poverty takes on added significance."

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, is a
nonpartisan research organization and policy institute that conducts
research and analysis on a range of government policies and programs, and
specializes in issues related to fiscal policy, social welfare and
nutrition policy. It is supported primarily by foundation grants.

Date posted: Wed Mar 11 14:05:05 PST 1998

HandsNet on the web is a service of HandsNet, Inc.
For more information, write to <>


ARCHIVES  <>  read posts to HPN
TO JOIN  <> or email Tom <>