Re: liberals pro-misfit & anti-white? -

Bonnie Briggs (
Mon, 04 May 1998 10:20:57 PDT

>[Is it worth replying to hate-posts such as the one below? If so, how?
>The bottom of this Usenet post listed many links to White Power web 
>I've ficticiously titled the article...]
>Does anything look familiar to you about the following statement:  "The
>social services agency of Anytown announced yesterday that it was
>expanding its services to include minorities, illegal aliens, the
>homeless, AIDS patients, gays and......women."
>It should look sadly familiar.  It's typical of the sort of "news item"
>we, as White women, often encounter in our daily newspaper.  Have you
>noticed how the mention of "women" is often tacked - invariably at the
>end - to a list of social misfits, non-Whites, losers, weirdos, and
>other assorted miscreants of society by liberal reporters as they write
>their liberal-slant stories in their leftist newspapers?  What's this
>phenomenon all about?  Why are women always lumped in with this
>disgusting Rogues Gallery line-up of society's losers and misfits?
>There's a sociological term I learned in one of my college classes
>(taught by a typically leftist professor) called "co-optation".  That's
>a fancy way of saying "included" or "taken over by" or "brought into" a
>particular group so that they can use you to their advantage.  
>dictionary defines co-opt as:  "to choose or elect as a fellow member 
>colleague."  The fact is - women have been "co-opted" by the corrupt
>Liberal Establishment in order to make a tenuous (and of course,
>politically advantageous) link between women and "people of color" (or
>gays, druggies, and any other creep they happen to want to include in
>"THE LIST").  The media has "elected" women to be the "fellow members
>and colleagues" of an unsavory group which usually features
>law-breakers, homos, the 'culturally diverse", bums, and
>ill,dysfunctional individuals from every walk of life.  Hmmmm, seems we
>woman have been "elected" by the media to be a member of certain groups
>without first taking OUR vote!  It's a variation on the media ploy of
>always uttering the phrase "Blacks and Jews" in the same breath.  If 
>say it often enough, like a mantra, your brainwashed audience will
>(supposedly) begin to actually believe there's a real-world bond of
>brotherhood between Blacks and Jews.  Say it with me now:  blacks and
>jews, blacks and jews, blacks and jews, blacks and jews, blacks, and
>jews.  Now say:  homosexuals, blacks, jews, illegal aliens, the
>homeless, the abused and...............WOMEN.  See how it works?  If
>your "group" has been declared by the media to be part of the line-up,
>it must be because you have a mysterious elemental bond, something "in
>common with" the other folks on the list.  Right?  Example:  "Last
>night, the City Council voted to insure that illegals, drug users,
>blacks, jews and women have been granted protective status.."  Blah 
>blah............and WOMEN.  Haven't we all heard this before?  I have -
>a million times.  And I'm sick of it.
>As women, and most important, as WHITE women engaged in a desperate
>battle for the future of our race, our nation, and our families, can we
>afford to be continually lumped in with the scum of the earth, as if we
>have something in common with them?  The answer is:  NO!  How cruddy 
>low-down do these lists have to become before we protest?
>".......rapists, murderers, child molesters, scumbags of the universe
>and ..oh the way.....WOMEN."???
>The media connection between White women and these societal horrors is
>as spurious as the black/jew connection.  It's a media invention,
>designed to create links where there are none - to forge bonds where
>none, in reality, exist.  "Establishment" White women (the ones who 
>bought into the liberal garbage) have become so brainwashed that many 
>them actually believe they have something in common with a black man or
>an illegal alien who broke the law of entry into someone else's 
>or "minorities" simply because some media pundit told them so.
>(women=minorities?  Let's not forget that women are not a minority - we
>comprise 50% of the human race!)  Women have about as much in common
>with these groups as a Chinese Communist has with Pat Buchanan.  Of
>course the "bond" that we as women supposedly all have in common with
>these other "groups" is oppression.  We're all part of the great
>oppressed.  Well, perhaps if you're a brain-dead hippie from the 1960's
>you really think John Lennon had a point when he wrote his song, "Woman
>Is The Nigger Of The World", but, luckily the rest of us have long 
>grown up and moved on from mush-headed, leftist rock 'n roll 
>The media is adept at telling the "sheeple" where the bonds of
>"commonality" are.  It's as if they're saying, " you and you and you
>have a common bond and a common enemy because we said so, get it?  Got
>it?  Good.  " And, of course, the unspoken media "truth" buried within
>these human laundry lists is that all of us:  bums and gays and illegal
>aliens and dope-heads and........  WOMEN are united against the WHITE
>MALE as the ultimate oppressor who must be destroyed.
>What we need to understand, as White women, is that we are being USED 
>pawns in a dirty game.  The callous, game-playing jewish feminists like
>Gloria Steinam and Betty Friedan have been more than happy to see women
>lumped in with scumbags for the last 30 years.  "Scumbags Of The World
>Unite!"  is their battle cry.  Feminist "leaders" such as Steinam and
>Friedan perfected and refined the co-optation game.  But don't be 
>White woman!  Demand to be taken off their "list"!!!!  You'll never 
>any advantange from being included in their "social services" scam,
>which goes something like this:  don't worry, ladies, assistance is on
>the way for transients, heroin addicts, pick-pockets and...............
>WOMEN!!.  The only thing that you, as a White woman, are ever going to
>get from a deal like this is:  USED -- by a sophisticated, slick,
>minority-loving, White-hating machine.  Then, you'll be dumped with a
>resounding thud on the side of the road when this crew has gotten their
>media mileage out of you.  You are no different from any other "group"
>that has been taken advantage of by the master manipulators of this
>society, playing off White men against White women.  Make no mistake:
>these media moguls do not "care" about women.  Women's welfare and
>well-being is the last thing on their mind.If they truly cared, they'd
>be writing stories about the daily hell that White women have to deal
>with in their minority infested schools, jobs and on the street.  The
>harrowing problems, trials and tribulations that White women experience
>on a daily basis as they attempt to deal with the frightening racial
>situation in their daily lives is hushed up, swept under the rug,
>unknown and unreported by this "caring" media gang, who loves us soooo
>much.  As we all know, if you approach one of these "loving" media 
>about a real-world story dealing with White woman's plight in the
>anti-White society of today, (stories which would tear your heart out
>and rival any minority-loving "Human Interest" story ever printed by 
>typical establishment rag), you'll be called "racist" and summarily
>tossed out of the editor's office.  Gee, and I thought they wuvved us
>ladies.  Maybe they don't "care" for us so much after all, huh?
>The incredibly harmful psychological impact of women being lumped in
>with the losers of the world is enormous.  Our very gender is now
>synonymous with "illegal alien" or "homeless" or "minority".  Woman.
>She's just like an illegal alien, didn't you know ?  Woman.  She's the
>same as homeless.  Woman means "loser" . It means victim.  Woman=Black.
>Woman=Jewish.  (As we all know, the media has made sure that "Woman"
>certainly isn't synonymous with the words Proud and White!)  The
>constant pounding of this false concept into our minds leads to only 
>horrible and sad conclusion:  the demoralization and degradation of
>White womanhood.
>The next time you see one of these disgusting lists, sit down, get out
>pen and paper (or typewriter or word processor), and write a letter to
>the editor of your local newspaper.  PROTEST.  State clearly:  I'm sick
>of seeing women included in these grotesque line-ups as if we are bags
>of dirty laundry, CO-OPTED and USED by a callous liberal establishment
>for their own self-serving, New World Order plans.  State plainly: 
>women are not losers, illegals, faggots, or scum.  We are not
>professional victims.  We are sick of being identified AS A GROUP with
>crud.  Make it clear:  We want it stopped!  And we want it stopped NOW!
>We, as free, proud White women of the world are here to say:  take us
>off your Liberal Loser's List!!!!
>[Your comments?]

Bonnie Briggs
Hi gang,
  What about Black women, Native women, Chinese women, etc? Should they 
not also demand to be taken off that list? 

Get Your Private, Free Email at