Re: liberals pro-misfit & anti-white? - "hate the homeless" file FWD

P. Myers (
Sat, 2 May 1998 21:06:53 -0700 (PDT)

To answer your question, Tom, there are a number of opinions.  People of
color say is too draining of energies needed elsewhere to deal
with the usual racism.  Women of color, historically kept out of positions
of power within feminist org.s have spent most of their/our lives dealing
with doubled-and-more discrimination:  gendered; race-ed; age-ed; etc.

The Anti-Defamation League, however, encourages folks to visit these hate
sites, correct with laughter their slimy, divisive comments, and continue
to do that. 

But homelessness is another issue, to has a history of what would
seem to be an appalling degree of social acceptance that, at least in this
country's timeline, is shorter than racism (dealing with just these two
now), and has at least one period of time (the Depression) when many felt
they were in the same sinking boat...although people of color had, at that
time, the added burden of losing positions to whites out of work and out
of money. 

I hate when I hear people (white) who survived say that anyone could make
it through those years, when  what one required was to be creative *and
white, to avoid the worst of the worst times....but then, whites had
farther to fall (in many ways) and less experience with dashed and never
permitted expectations/hopes.

I stay away...but watch my back, and speak out, online and in person.

(I have friends who carry mason jars when they travel in certain
neighborhoods -- rural and urban -- so they don't need to leave their cars
to relieve themselves...)

What are your thoughts, Tom?  Pat

On Sat, 2 May 1998, Tom Boland wrote:

> [Is it worth replying to hate-posts such as the one below? If so, how?
> The bottom of this Usenet post listed many links to White Power web sites.
> I've ficticiously titled the article...]
> Does anything look familiar to you about the following statement:  "The
> social services agency of Anytown announced yesterday that it was
> expanding its services to include minorities, illegal aliens, the
> homeless, AIDS patients, gays and......women."
> It should look sadly familiar.  It's typical of the sort of "news item"
> we, as White women, often encounter in our daily newspaper.  Have you
> noticed how the mention of "women" is often tacked - invariably at the
> end - to a list of social misfits, non-Whites, losers, weirdos, and
> other assorted miscreants of society by liberal reporters as they write
> their liberal-slant stories in their leftist newspapers?  What's this
> phenomenon all about?  Why are women always lumped in with this
> disgusting Rogues Gallery line-up of society's losers and misfits?
> There's a sociological term I learned in one of my college classes
> (taught by a typically leftist professor) called "co-optation".  That's
> a fancy way of saying "included" or "taken over by" or "brought into" a
> particular group so that they can use you to their advantage.  Webster's
> dictionary defines co-opt as:  "to choose or elect as a fellow member or
> colleague."  The fact is - women have been "co-opted" by the corrupt
> Liberal Establishment in order to make a tenuous (and of course,
> politically advantageous) link between women and "people of color" (or
> gays, druggies, and any other creep they happen to want to include in
> "THE LIST").  The media has "elected" women to be the "fellow members
> and colleagues" of an unsavory group which usually features
> law-breakers, homos, the 'culturally diverse", bums, and
> ill,dysfunctional individuals from every walk of life.  Hmmmm, seems we
> woman have been "elected" by the media to be a member of certain groups
> without first taking OUR vote!  It's a variation on the media ploy of
> always uttering the phrase "Blacks and Jews" in the same breath.  If you
> say it often enough, like a mantra, your brainwashed audience will
> (supposedly) begin to actually believe there's a real-world bond of
> brotherhood between Blacks and Jews.  Say it with me now:  blacks and
> jews, blacks and jews, blacks and jews, blacks and jews, blacks, and
> jews.  Now say:  homosexuals, blacks, jews, illegal aliens, the
> homeless, the abused and...............WOMEN.  See how it works?  If
> your "group" has been declared by the media to be part of the line-up,
> it must be because you have a mysterious elemental bond, something "in
> common with" the other folks on the list.  Right?  Example:  "Last
> night, the City Council voted to insure that illegals, drug users,
> blacks, jews and women have been granted protective status.."  Blah blah
> blah............and WOMEN.  Haven't we all heard this before?  I have -
> a million times.  And I'm sick of it.
> As women, and most important, as WHITE women engaged in a desperate
> battle for the future of our race, our nation, and our families, can we
> afford to be continually lumped in with the scum of the earth, as if we
> have something in common with them?  The answer is:  NO!  How cruddy and
> low-down do these lists have to become before we protest?
> ".......rapists, murderers, child molesters, scumbags of the universe
> and ..oh the way.....WOMEN."???
> The media connection between White women and these societal horrors is
> as spurious as the black/jew connection.  It's a media invention,
> designed to create links where there are none - to forge bonds where
> none, in reality, exist.  "Establishment" White women (the ones who have
> bought into the liberal garbage) have become so brainwashed that many of
> them actually believe they have something in common with a black man or
> an illegal alien who broke the law of entry into someone else's country,
> or "minorities" simply because some media pundit told them so.
> (women=minorities?  Let's not forget that women are not a minority - we
> comprise 50% of the human race!)  Women have about as much in common
> with these groups as a Chinese Communist has with Pat Buchanan.  Of
> course the "bond" that we as women supposedly all have in common with
> these other "groups" is oppression.  We're all part of the great
> oppressed.  Well, perhaps if you're a brain-dead hippie from the 1960's
> you really think John Lennon had a point when he wrote his song, "Woman
> Is The Nigger Of The World", but, luckily the rest of us have long since
> grown up and moved on from mush-headed, leftist rock 'n roll propaganda.
> The media is adept at telling the "sheeple" where the bonds of
> "commonality" are.  It's as if they're saying, " you and you and you
> have a common bond and a common enemy because we said so, get it?  Got
> it?  Good.  " And, of course, the unspoken media "truth" buried within
> these human laundry lists is that all of us:  bums and gays and illegal
> aliens and dope-heads and........  WOMEN are united against the WHITE
> MALE as the ultimate oppressor who must be destroyed.
> What we need to understand, as White women, is that we are being USED as
> pawns in a dirty game.  The callous, game-playing jewish feminists like
> Gloria Steinam and Betty Friedan have been more than happy to see women
> lumped in with scumbags for the last 30 years.  "Scumbags Of The World
> Unite!"  is their battle cry.  Feminist "leaders" such as Steinam and
> Friedan perfected and refined the co-optation game.  But don't be fooled
> White woman!  Demand to be taken off their "list"!!!!  You'll never gain
> any advantange from being included in their "social services" scam,
> which goes something like this:  don't worry, ladies, assistance is on
> the way for transients, heroin addicts, pick-pockets and...............
> WOMEN!!.  The only thing that you, as a White woman, are ever going to
> get from a deal like this is:  USED -- by a sophisticated, slick,
> minority-loving, White-hating machine.  Then, you'll be dumped with a
> resounding thud on the side of the road when this crew has gotten their
> media mileage out of you.  You are no different from any other "group"
> that has been taken advantage of by the master manipulators of this
> society, playing off White men against White women.  Make no mistake:
> these media moguls do not "care" about women.  Women's welfare and
> well-being is the last thing on their mind.If they truly cared, they'd
> be writing stories about the daily hell that White women have to deal
> with in their minority infested schools, jobs and on the street.  The
> harrowing problems, trials and tribulations that White women experience
> on a daily basis as they attempt to deal with the frightening racial
> situation in their daily lives is hushed up, swept under the rug,
> unknown and unreported by this "caring" media gang, who loves us soooo
> much.  As we all know, if you approach one of these "loving" media types
> about a real-world story dealing with White woman's plight in the
> anti-White society of today, (stories which would tear your heart out
> and rival any minority-loving "Human Interest" story ever printed by the
> typical establishment rag), you'll be called "racist" and summarily
> tossed out of the editor's office.  Gee, and I thought they wuvved us
> ladies.  Maybe they don't "care" for us so much after all, huh?
> The incredibly harmful psychological impact of women being lumped in
> with the losers of the world is enormous.  Our very gender is now
> synonymous with "illegal alien" or "homeless" or "minority".  Woman.
> She's just like an illegal alien, didn't you know ?  Woman.  She's the
> same as homeless.  Woman means "loser" . It means victim.  Woman=Black.
> Woman=Jewish.  (As we all know, the media has made sure that "Woman"
> certainly isn't synonymous with the words Proud and White!)  The
> constant pounding of this false concept into our minds leads to only one
> horrible and sad conclusion:  the demoralization and degradation of
> White womanhood.
> The next time you see one of these disgusting lists, sit down, get out
> pen and paper (or typewriter or word processor), and write a letter to
> the editor of your local newspaper.  PROTEST.  State clearly:  I'm sick
> of seeing women included in these grotesque line-ups as if we are bags
> of dirty laundry, CO-OPTED and USED by a callous liberal establishment
> for their own self-serving, New World Order plans.  State plainly: White
> women are not losers, illegals, faggots, or scum.  We are not
> professional victims.  We are sick of being identified AS A GROUP with
> crud.  Make it clear:  We want it stopped!  And we want it stopped NOW!
> We, as free, proud White women of the world are here to say:  take us
> off your Liberal Loser's List!!!!
> [Your comments?]

"To live dangerously is to live
in the Borderland, where desire,
justice and love meet."
                    Henry Giroux