Fw: Re: David R. Quammen's "Introduction"

H. C. Covington (ach1@sprynet.com)
Fri, 5 Jun 1998 01:54:47 -0500

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Gottfried <billg@MFI.NET>
Subject: Re: David R. Quammen's "Introduction"

Do you ever sleep???  Please extend my warmest thoughts and prayers to the
people that you extend yourself to at your dining's!!! David's introduction
exemplifies to me that everything happens for a reason.

Oh yes, the word "reason".  If we as humans will ever quit trying to
everything in the human context, then, yes,  "The Door" does open for
Glorious things  to occur.  It's about faith; it's about believing in "The
Divine"; it's about falling down and having the inspiration to get back up
again; it's about admitting that we are wrong and having the ability to
rebound; it's about giving a homeless person $10 at a stop sign while
driving without having to take the additional time to analyse everything;
it's about not holding back; etc...

It's really about all of us and how we can see Christ in other people,
especially the poor!!!   It's about connecting to other people, thru
"Our Savior".  You know what? It's not an it.  It is all of "US" working
together with a shared synergy!!!!!!!

For The Love of The Poor,

Bill G.

----Original Message-----
From: Ross Dizon <rdizon@MARIN.ORG>
Date: Tuesday, June 02, 1998 3:29 PM
Subject: David R. Quammen's "Introduction"

>Please allow me to say at the outset that if David's self-introduction was
>occasioned in any way by my mistaking him for the author of "Wild Thoughts
>from Wild Places," I am glad I made the mistake and would now consider my
>error a "happy fault."
>I didn't think David had to introduce himself to me, though, because I
>believed I had gotten to know him from visiting his web site and reading
>posts.  But it's now clear to me that there's much that's important about
>him that I would not have known had he not introduced himself by way of
>"Where Is It Written" and "Sunday in DC."  I had already thanked him
>privately and personally.  Today I'd like to thank him publicly for his
>self-revelation which, I can see it now, will surely provide me with
>opportunity to encounter our gracious God.  I am touched by David's candid
>revelation.  It's always risky to reveal oneself because one becomes
>vulnerable by doing so.  As Dorothy Day puts it (I can't remember her
>words), to go to confession is hard, to write is hard, because one gives
>oneself away.  But she quickly adds that if one loves, one gives oneself.
>And David certainly strikes me as someone who is deeply committed to
>himself.  I realize St. Vincent discouraged his followers from praising
>people in public and in their presence.  But I'll do the unvincentian
>and say that I find very impressive David's energetic commitment to those
>for whom Jesus became the Christ, the Annointed, and to whom he was sent
>bring the good news.
>I suspect there are those who would be offended by what they might
>to be sweeping generalizations regarding "a corrupt system of market
>capitalism" or the "Industry of Charity" that provides careers to the
>class folks more than it gives employment to the poor and would also take
>exception to the statements regarding the "self-righteous bigots."  But
>and offensive sayings must be expressed too, I believe, and more power to
>David for taking upon himself--and relieving us of--this unpleasant and
>burdensome task.  Appropos the question of not offending and being
>"prudently reconcialiatory," please allow me to cite from an old issue of
>America (05/18/91) that I accidentally picked up late last Sunday.  I am
>going to cite from someone's appreciation of the late, largely
>Catholic Biblical scholar John L. McKenzie.  The tribute reads in part:
>                To the distress of many, scholars and non-scholars, he
>        [i.e., J.L. McKenzie] was adamant in his insistence that what
>        the Gospels say Jesus said is what Jesus meant and what He
>        meant to be lived by His followers in daily life.  He bemoaned
>        the corruption of a Christian "prudence" which he said "has
>        long been, not the virtue by which one discerns the Christian
>        thing to do, but the virtue by which one finds sound reason for
>        evading the Christian thing to do.  I have never read of any
>        martyr who, if he or she had the course in Christian prudence
>        which I had in the seminary, could not have evaded martyrdom
>        with a good conscience."
>                He ceaselessly taught that reform and renewal of the
>        church based on Holy Scripture requires that Christians
>        "renounce remarks about the impracticality of the Christian
>        stance" and begin to "establish a consensus that Jesus did
>        speak effectively to living as a Christian in the modern
>        world."
>By the way, this McKenzie, as many would know, also authored "The Power
>the Wisdom," an interpretation of the New Testament that Dorothy Day said
>was the most authentic interpretation she had ever read.
>Echoing the tribute I've just cited but referring to David, I'd like to
>that maybe, from the human point of view, our society is not any better
>when first David started his work for the poor, but there is no way, I
>think, the ripple of truth and love he has started at great personal cost
>going to be for naught.