Re: homeless camp at South Platte river (Denver) FWD
Virginia Sellner (wych@tcd.net)
Tue, 20 Jan 1998 21:25:31 -0800
They also removed homeless camps from under bridges along Cherry Creek in
Denver. I'm not sure which removal came first, but I think it was Cherry
Creek and then the S. Platte -- if the S. Platte is where Clintonville was
located. A lot of the people are still down there and camping, just in
different places -- they moved further out. The South Platte near downtown
has been developed and they want to develop more and that must've had a lot
to do with the removals. I read an article I think when they moved people
out from under the bridges on Cherry Creek that a lot of people indicated
that they did not feel a threat from the homeless, but they were moved
anyway. i haven't read anything about this recently -- we do take the
Denver paper and try and keep up with what's going on down there.
>
>Virginia
>
>
>At 08:38 PM 1/20/98 PST, Theodore Latham wrote:
>>Tom,
>>
>> I have seen this sort of thing first habd in 1996 when I was
>>homeless i Phoenix, AZ. There were encampments of homeless people all
>>along the Rio Salido, under the 7th Ave. or 7th St. (I forget because
>>Phoenix's streets and avenues are East-West coordinated) bridge
>>underpass. The majority of them were anti-shelterist like the ones you
>>mentioned in your posting. They literally had canvas tents pitched, and
>>occasionally the Phoenix Metropolitian Police would come in and harass
>>them and write a few citations. It is sad that media & anti homeless
>>activist can be so down on a person bathing in the river when Jesus
>>Christ and the gang knew no other way to clean their bodies, all those
>>many years ago. Nuff Said!
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Tedrico
>>
>>
>>_________________________
>>TEDRICO'S PAGE
>>http://members.metrocity.net/Alternative/tedrico/homepage.html
>>Education, Shelter, and Food Assistance for the Homeless!
>>[mailto: tedrico@hotmail.com ]
>>
>>>From hpn-owner@aspin.asu.edu Tue Jan 20 16:39:19 1998
>>>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by aspin.asu.edu (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
>>RAA22060 for hpn-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:33:51 -0700
>>>Received: from germany.it.earthlink.net (germany-c.it.earthlink.net
>>[204.250.46.123]) by aspin.asu.edu (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA22056
>>for <hpn@aspin.asu.edu>; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:33:48 -0700
>>>Received: from [153.35.78.223] (1Cust95.max19.boston.ma.ms.uu.net
>>[153.35.78.223])
>>> by germany.it.earthlink.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA18121
>>> for <hpn@aspin.asu.edu>; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 16:34:27 -0800 (PST)
>>>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 16:34:27 -0800 (PST)
>>>X-Sender: wgcp@mail.earthlink.net
>>>Message-Id: <v01530500b0e957da4282@[153.35.79.116]>
>>>Mime-Version: 1.0
>>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>To: hpn@aspin.asu.edu
>>>From: wgcp@earthlink.net (Tom Boland)
>>>Subject: homeless camp at South Platte river (Denver) FWD
>>>Sender: owner-hpn@aspin.asu.edu
>>>Precedence: bulk
>>>
>>>FWD CC Replies to richj@fc.hp.com (Rich Johnson)
>>>
>>>It would be nice if homelessness were simply a matter of people not
>>>having a place to stay. If that were so then we could simply build
>>>enough shelters to house them. I don't think the answer is that simple,
>>>though. As an example, I'll use a somewhat recent controversy in
>>Denver.
>>>
>>>Along the South Platte river there used to be a sort of camp that was
>>the
>>>home of a couple of hundred homeless people. The city decided to make
>>the
>>>area a park which had the effect of driving off the people who were
>>living
>>>there. Further, the reason the city made the area a park was to drive
>>off
>>>the people who were living there.
>>>
>>>Anyway, the whole thing was being discussed on the radio one morning
>>when I
>>>was on my way to work. The radio hosts were taking calls form people to
>>>solicit opinions. One caller was a man who said that a couple of years
>>>before he had lived in the camp. He said that the reason the people
>>were
>>>there and not in the shelters was because they didn't like the rules
>>that
>>>the shelters required them to follow. Particularly onerous was the rule
>>>against drunkeness in the shelters. So they found a piece of ground
>>where
>>>they could live as they see fit.
>>>
>>>The city could have left them alone, except that the area had no sewage
>>>system and that constitutes a threat to public health. Also, there were
>>>complaints from commuters about people bathing nude in the river.
>>Finally,
>>>violent crime was a problem. For these reasons, and perhaps others, the
>>>city decided to break up the camp.
>>>
>>>Now, I don't know what the right answer is here. I suspect there isn't
>>one.
>>>How can money be spent to battle this problem?
>>>
>>>Rich
>>>
>>>END FORWARD
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>______________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>
>>
>
______________________________________________
Speak only words of truth.
Speak only of the good qualities of others.
Be a confidant and carry no tales.
Dhyani Ywahoo,"Voices of our Ancestors, Cherokee teachings from the Wisdom
Fire".