ordinance proposed to feed hungry legally in Richmond, VA FWD
Tom Boland (wgcp@earthlink.net)
Mon, 27 Apr 1998 16:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
http://www.gatewayva.com/rtd/virginia/placom212.htm
FWD Richmond Times-Dispatch
CHURCH-FEEDINGS PLAN GOES TO CITY COUNCIL
PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, April 21, 1998
BY GORDON HICKEY
Times-Dispatch Staff Writer
Richmond churches in residential neighborhoods may finally be able to
feed the hungry legally.
A proposed ordinance advanced by the city Planning Commission
yesterday gives the churches what they say they have had a right to all
along: unrestricted permission to feed the hungry.
But the proposal didn't get through the Planning Commission
unquestioned, nor did it get the commission's approval.
Because the commission couldn't muster a quorum of five voting
members -- four were
not there when the issue came up and a fifth abstained -- the ordinance
was simply passed on to the council with no formal recommendation.
The council will take up the matter next Monday night.
But that was good enough for church representatives who attended
yesterday's meeting. "Thank goodness," said Patti Russell, director of
the meal ministry at Stuart Circle Parish.
Her reaction to the apparent end of the long Planning Commission
process came after she urged the commission to accept the language of
the ordinance. "It's simple. It's straightforward."
The ordinance basically would allow feeding programs as a "charitable
or fellowship use within the church or place of worship" in a
residential
neighborhood. Church meal programs already are allowed in the
downtown area.
The city staff, though, did suggest some restrictions to that simple
language. Senior Planner Roger York Jr. said the feeding programs
should be restricted to "noncommercial uses" to block restaurants from
using churches and should be limited to organizations with ties to the
church. That would stop clubs with no church affiliations from using
the buildings.
Russell, though, said all that verbiage was unnecessary. She said the
staff was "inventing dragons to slay."
The Rev. Patrick J. Wilson III, executive director of the congress of
National Black Clergy, said that suggested change "would bring us
back full circle to where we started." And that could bring the church
and the city back to court.
The churches had agreed to drop a federal lawsuit challenging the city's
restrictions on feeding programs after the city said it would remove
them. If those restrictions were put back, the suit might also come
back,
Wilson said.
"We did not contemplate we would still be here today debating this
issue," he said.
Planning Commission Chairman Willard M. Scribner, though, said the
staff's concerns over the language were important. He suggested
yesterday's discussion be delayed two weeks. That suggestion went
nowhere.
The commission's action of passing the ordinance on to the council may
bring to an end a protracted battle over the meal programs.
The issue arose last year when some residents of the Fan District
objected to a church feeding program operated by the Stuart Circle
Parish in their neighborhood. Because of those objections, the council
passed laws in July restricting feeding programs outside downtown to
no more than seven times a year and no more than 30 people at a time.
Before the laws were enforced, church leaders and advocates for the
homeless mounted a protest. Council members admitted their error,
reversed course, decided to repeal the laws and told the commission to
come up with something the churches and residents could live with.
Also yesterday, the Planning Commission recommended that Freedom
House at 1201 Hull St. be allowed to expand its hours and open a
winter shelter for 10 people.
The organization now is forced to close from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily,
which means the 40 or so people who live there in transitional housing
must leave the building. That forces shift workers onto the streets in
the middle of the day.
Freedom House doesn't have a homeless shelter but would be allowed
to have one for 10 people from October to April, if the council accepts
the recommendation of the commission.
Commission member Stephen V. Donahue, who is a South Richmond
businessman, objected because, "Hull Street's becoming the social
services delivery corridor." He asked the commission to delay the vote
to give area business owners a chance to learn about the changes. His
request was rejected.
END FORWARD
HOMELESS PEOPLE'S NETWORK <http://aspin.asu.edu/hpn/> Home Page
ARCHIVES <http://aspin.asu.edu/hpn/archives.html> read posts to HPN
TO JOIN <http://aspin.asu.edu/hpn/join.html> or email Tom <wgcp@earthlink.net>