[Hpn] Bellevue plan seen as threat to tent cities
William Charles Tinker
Sat, 4 Jun 2005 04:48:53 -0400
Has contacted me and him, and she has asked him if he wants to be removed
from HPN list,I think the man should not have joined in the first place if
he has never been homeless, and appears to be just a whiner.
I know when I came to HPN I was green on usage of computer, but I never sent
the same message 20 times to the list just to be a asshole.
He is spamming himself and the list.
Since you have so much compassion and free time on your hands brother why
do you not help him find his niche on HPN or off it?
And no the kill file is actually a good tool especially if one is being
bombarded with petty arsed childish games as this fellow plays,he has
ComCast for his ISP it is broad band so he has plenty of power (and yet he
complains I am flooding his PC) why he uses it to complain and not input
change just boogles my mind.
No Unclescam you are much better trained in the art of " facisim or brown
shirt" nosing why don't you contact him, and help him to understand he just
got a notice from HPN and he should read it on how to unsubscribe or change
his e-mail settings?
I have sent him numerous e-mails telling him who to contact email@example.com
and he still does not get the picture,perhaps if you brought some color
crayons and Dick and Jane story book he would understand you?
----- Original Message -----
From: "unclescam" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Hpn] Bellevue plan seen as threat to tent cities
bill, there is no response from the admimistration of hpn to
his request to be taken off the list. don't know which one, because you
are mixing your lists inti the hpn mix and not telling which is which.
hpn should be run by someone. if tom is not doing it, it should be
eliminated it's function as a news service is limited to what you post
and most of that is off topic. this kill file shit is fascist power
usage. help him get off the list is the proper response. be kind to
those without your immense brain power. where is your compassion?
On 6/3/2005, "William Charles Tinker" <email@example.com> wrote:
>I HAVE PLACED THIS MAN INTO BLOCKED SENDER HE IS ONE BRAIN CELL SHY OF A
>HE IS SPAMMING EVERY ONE!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> To: William Charles Tinker ; email@example.com
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [Hpn] Bellevue plan seen as threat to tent cities
> S T O P S E N D I N G M E E M A I L S
> WHAT SHOULD I DO TO PUT SOME HUMAN SENCE IN YOUR HEAD
> YOU ARE A MAN WITH NO FEELING NO BRAIN YOU BELONG TO THE ZOO NOT AMONG
> HUMANS, WELL IF YOU INSIST IN CONTINUING SENDING ME YOUR STUPID E MAILS I
> WILL KEEP SENDING YOU THE REPLY YOU DESERVE
> -------------- Original message --------------
> > June 3, 2005
> > Bellevue plan seen as threat to tent cities
> > Full story:
> > lug=homeless03e&date=20050603
> > By Natalie Singer
> > Seattle Times Eastside bureau
> > Homeless groups and some freedom-of-religion advocates are upset over
> > strict new proposal that would, if passed, make it difficult for
> > homeless encampments such as Tent City 4 to locate in the city of
> > The regulations, set to be discussed at a public hearing Monday, were
> > up by city planners and will eventually be considered by the City
> > The draft rules are more restrictive than similar ordinances recently
> > passed by other jurisdictions, including one approved last month by
> > Metropolitan King County Council.
> > Opponents say the Bellevue proposal -- which regulates everything
> > bathroom facilities to communicable diseases -- would make it nearly
> > impossible for churches to host tent cities and could violate
> > freedom-of-religion laws.
> > "Bellevue has really set back the cause of religious freedom," said
> > Rev. Sanford Brown, executive director of the Church Council of
> > Seattle, which represents more than 400 churches and 15 denominations
> in the
> > region. "It is trying to nit-pick the churches to the point of
> > Brown said the council's concerns have been passed on to city staff,
> > that if significant changes aren't made before it's adopted, the
> group would
> > consider legal action.
> > "We would find it our responsibility to challenge it in court. These
> > regulations are frivolous and arbitrary. ... We just can't let it
> > Under the rules, temporary outdoor homeless encampments would be
> limited to
> > a 60-day stay rather than the current 90 days, would require hot and
> > running water (which tent cities do not currently have) and would
> allow no
> > more than 100 people, and sometimes fewer, depending on site size
> > current rules have no specific limits).
> > Shelter operators also would have to immediately report to health
> > authorities the name and address of anyone "known to have or
> suspected of
> > having a communicable disease."
> > "That totally breaches confidentiality -- it forces churches to out
> > somebody," Brown said.
> > Other proposed changes include:
> > Camps would need one sink for every six people, one shower for every
> > people, one toilet for every 15 people and mechanical refrigeration
> > perishable food.
> > The camp would have to follow the set-back requirements that apply to
> > existing site user (usually a church).
> > A camp would have to be surrounded by a "view-obscuring fence" with a
> > minimum height of 6 feet.
> > Opponents complain that some of the language was taken from other
> > such as those governing migrant-farm worker housing. But those
> > are different from a temporary homeless shelter and should not be
> used as a
> > model, they say.
> > "There are dozens of picky little things that they want to
> > said Bruce Thomas, a resident of Tent City 4, now at a Kirkland
> church. "It
> > would make it impossible to locate there."
> > Though some Bellevue churches have discussed the issue, none have yet
> > to host the encampment, which has been roving around the Eastside for
> > a year.
> > Opponents agree that tent cities should be regulated, but they want
> > Bellevue to use the recent King County ordinance instead. They say it
> > strikes the right balance between allowing religious institutions to
> > the camps and responding to neighborhood safety and cleanliness
> > "Why reinvent the wheel?" Thomas said. "We already went through this
> > process with King County and all the groups involved and reached a
> > compromise."
> > City representatives say the draft ordinance is just that -- a
> draft -- and
> > that changes can still be made.
> > "It's intended to stimulate a discussion," said City Manager Steve
> > "It's not Bellevue's intention to infringe on the constitutional
> rights of
> > any church. I fully expect modifications [to the proposal]."
> > If passed, the Bellevue ordinance would create a new section of law
> to deal
> > specifically with homeless camps. Currently, the shelters fall under
> > same section as other temporary uses, such as sidewalk sales and
> > Christmas-tree lots.
> > Under the new proposal, the siting of a homeless encampment would
> become a
> > more public -- but also a lengthier -- process, said Mary Kate
> Berens, a
> > city planner.
> > Currently, no public notice is required when a group applies for a
> > homeless-camp permit, and there is no public-comment period or appeal
> > process if residents dispute the permit issued.
> > If the proposed ordinance is enacted, it would require public notice
> and a
> > public-comment period when a group applies for a homeless-camp
> permit. After
> > the director of planning and community development makes a decision,
> > could be appealed to a city hearing examiner.
> > After the City Council receives all public input on the ordinance, it
> > suggest changes and likely vote by the end of July.
> > Natalie Singer: 206-464-2704 or firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Copyright (c) 2004 The Seattle Times Company
> > www.seattletimes.com