[Hpn] Liberals not keeping their promise to build some 20,000 affordable
Wed, 24 Nov 2004 03:49:40 -0500
Nov. 24, 2004. 01:00 AM
Homeless have a point
Liberals not keeping their promise to build some 20,000 affordable
housing units for `needy Ontario families'
A protest by the homeless and their supporters ended with a whimper at
Queen's Park yesterday.
After six protesters were arrested on Monday for pitching a tent in
front of the Legislature, another dozen spent the night there sleeping
out in the open before quietly dispersing yesterday morning.
They got some media attention, which focused mainly on the arrests and
on an arcane constitutional debate about whether the Charter of Rights
applies to the grounds of the Legislature.
Inside, the protesters were mostly ignored by the politicians, although
the New Democrats devoted some of their allotted time in question period
to the protest.
Their questions were met with bafflegab from the Liberal government.
This is unfortunate, because the protesters were actually making a valid
point: The Liberals are not keeping their promise to build some 20,000
affordable housing units for "needy Ontario families."
"We've invested $65 million so far, announcing 2,747 units," claimed
Premier Dalton McGuinty in response to NDP questioning.
But most of that money was supplied by the federal government and most
of those units were projects inherited from the previous Conservative
To date, the Liberals' own efforts to build social housing have been
Before getting into the Liberal record, however, some background is
When they took office in 1995, the Conservatives scrapped the province's
extensive social housing program. They called it a "boondoggle" and said
the private sector would fill the void.
But as nearly everyone in the housing field acknowledges, the private
sector is not good at meeting the needs of the low end of the market.
So virtually no social housing was built in the late 1990s, and waiting
lists ballooned. More than 70,000 are on the social-housing waiting list
in Toronto alone.
In 2001-02, the federal Liberals stepped into the void with a five-year
program for social housing. Ontario's share of the program was $367
million, or about $25,000 per unit of housing. The catch was that, in
order to receive the federal money, the province had to match it with
funding of its own.
The provincial Conservatives accepted this offer but said the matching
funds would have to come from the municipalities. All the province would
offer was a sales tax rebate, worth about $2,000 per unit.
Of course, the municipalities themselves didn't have the money, so the
social housing projects sat on the shelf.
In opposition, the provincial Liberals promised to end this stalemate
and unlock the federal housing money by providing the necessary matching
But once in office, the Liberals bumped up against the fiscal reality of
an inherited deficit.
In last spring's provincial budget, extra money was made available for
health (the public's top priority) and education (McGuinty's priority)
but for almost nothing else, including housing.
A few projects, the ones McGuinty referred to in the Legislature this
week, were pulled off the shelf and allowed to go ahead, but with
provincial subsidies of just $2,000 per unit.
Meanwhile, some $300 million in federal money for social housing
languishes unspent, and the clock is ticking on the five-year time limit
for accessing it.
"If we don't get the housing started soon, we're going to lose that
federal money," warns Michael Shapcott of the Toronto Disaster Relief
Committee, one of this week's protesters.
Not to worry, say the Liberals. Behind-the-scenes talks between Ottawa
and Queen's Park are proceeding apace and could soon lead to a new deal
that will free up the federal money and get some social housing built.
One option under consideration is front-end loading the program so that
the federal dollars could be spent now without the need for provincial
Then the province would shoulder the burden at the back end of the
program, when, presumably, the provincial treasury would be in a better
position to provide the funding.
A variation on this theme is that the federal government could get the
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. to lend the necessary matching funds
to the province at a low interest rate.
The new federal-provincial deal could also loosen restrictions on how
the money is spent to permit some of it to go toward shelter allowances,
or payments to low-income families to enable them to access housing in
the private market.
With an apartment vacancy rate of more than 4 per cent in Toronto, this
is seen as a good, short-term solution to the housing problem.
A deal of this sort would be a welcome step forward. The sooner the better.
Ian Urquhart writes on provincial affairs. His column appears Monday,
Wednesday and Saturday. email@example.com.
This message is certified virus-free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.1 - Release Date: 11/19/2004