[Hpn] Street newspapers' dilemma: money vs. mission

Morgan W. Brown norsehorse@hotmail.com
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 07:37:58 -0400


-------Forwarded article-------

Saturday, July 20, 2002
Boston Globe <http://www.boston.com/globe>
[Boston, Massachusetts]
Metro section: City & Region News
Page B1
Street newspapers' dilemma: money vs. mission
<http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/201/metro/Street_newspapers_dilemma_money_vs_mission+.shtml>


By David Abel, Globe Staff, 7/20/2002

Like many hardened activists, Mora LaMountain yearned for a permanent 
soapbox, one that would give voice to the legions of homeless in Southern 
California.



So, like a growing number of activists, the 41-year-old started a street 
newspaper called Making Change, a feisty quarterly sold by the homeless on 
the streets of Santa Monica.

Then came competition. The Big Issue, a chain of weekly street magazines 
from London featuring celebrity profiles, also sought to put money in the 
pockets of homeless vendors. But LaMountain was horrified.

''They were trying to sell a glossy puff piece that had no real social 
conscience,'' said LaMountain, who called it The Big Tissue. ''It seemed 
like they were trying to make money off the backs of poor people.''

Now, as scores of editors and publishers of street newspapers, many of them 
once homeless, meet this week in Boston, they're confronting a dilemma: Do 
they preserve their mission of giving voice to the homeless, or do they put 
more money in their pockets by publishing papers with a broader reach?

''It's the capitalists vs. the anarchists,'' said Norma Green, a journalism 
professor at Columbia College in Chicago, who has studied the rise of street 
papers. ''There are those who would sooner jump off a cliff than take an ad, 
and there are others who support whatever is necessary to help the homeless 
and get their message out.''

A decade ago, street newspapers were novelties, rants against corporations 
and screeds about unresponsive government. Today, what started out as a 
means of helping the homeless help themselves is increasingly becoming an 
institution. There are now 45 street newspapers in North America and more 
than 100 elsewhere, from Australia to Argentina.

The problem, some say, is that instead of running essays and poems by the 
homeless, too many are publishing entertainment news and catering to 
advertisers and corporate donors. As a result, feuds such as that between 
Making Change and The Big Issue are popping up around the country.

In Chicago, the debate about the direction of street newspapers - which 
publishers provide to homeless vendors, who buy them for little to nothing 
and sell them for a profit - reached a high point last year when several 
staffers at StreetWise quit because they believed the paper was selling out.

One of them, associate editor Kari Lydersen, says the paper was more 
interested in profit than people. ''We were even discouraged from writing 
about poverty,'' she said. ''It was all pro-corporate America and 
entertainment. There was no point anymore.''

Some argue, however, that supporting such an idealistic mission as helping 
the homeless requires a measure of pragmatism.

When he started in street newspapers a decade ago, helping found Boston's 
Spare Change in 1992, longtime activist Timothy Harris wanted nothing more 
than to provide a permanent voice to the voiceless. But he also wanted 
something people would read.

Since moving to Seattle and starting Real Change, one of the nation's 
largest street papers with about 30,000 copies sold every two months, he has 
sought a middle ground. He runs ads and rather than writing just for the 
poor, he aims at reaching the middle class, running columns such as ''News 
You Can Use'' and ''Notes from the Kitchen.''

''You can be professional without selling out,'' he insisted. ''Street 
papers have to start writing for their readers, or else they're going to 
fold - and they won't be able to carry the voices that other papers don't 
publish.''

One paper on the cusp of folding is Sacramento's Homeward Street Journal, 
whose editor, graphic designer, and sometimes writer, Gary Lee Parks, lives 
on the steps of a church and struggles to get by on the $100 a month he 
earns from helping publish the paper.

The paper, like many others, doesn't accept ads and survives on grants. In 
hard economic times, grants aren't a sure thing, and Parks says the 
five-year-old paper could go under any time.

''It's a struggle,'' he said, ''but it's a worthwhile struggle.''

A few hours away, in Santa Monica, where LaMountain first began distributing 
Making Change from her pickup truck four years ago, the struggle up to now 
has not been for naught.

Though like other papers, she runs into problems with police banning the 
homeless from selling the paper on certain corners, her paper has survived 
into its 16th issue and has a quarterly circulation of about 5,000. It has 
even earned enough money for the paper to afford a laptop computer.

And, best of all, she has outlasted the competition. About a year after The 
Big Issue started showing up on corners around Los Angeles, its publishers 
decided the costs were too high and decided to close the operation.

''You could call that sweet justice,'' LaMountain said.


David Abel can be reached at dabel@globe.com.


This story ran on page B1 of the Boston Globe on 7/20/2002.

--------------------------------------------------------

**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this
material is distributed without charge or profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
this type of information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only.**

--------------------------------------------------------

-------End of forward-------

Morgan <norsehorse@hotmail.com>
Morgan W. Brown
Montpelier Vermont USA



_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com