[Hpn] re, unclescam
Sun, 07 Jan 2001 22:07:32 -0500
then we agree. now the question is do we continue to push for the least we can
want or do we put our energies into the best we can envision. make no mistake
about it they will give us this piddling amount of succor, as it is a
transference of funds from one hand to another. i say let us go after the best
we could do: as the least is, as we agree, too little.
David and Deb Ward wrote:
> I agree, if housing is available, a person who is homeless should be able to
> aquire it. However, this person should be able to have the resources to keep
> this housing. There are a few homeless individuals that do not have the
> resources to keep a housing. Rhis is why a shelter is sometimes helpfull.
> Then again, the shelter should have some social services in place to help
> the homeless indiviual to become self sufficiant.
> Dave Ward
> unclescam wrote:
> > the concept is that if housing is available i don't need the
> > shelter.good or not
> > as it stands if they took the money spent on shelter it would provide
> > the housing. admittedly in the world as it is today we are forced into
> > providing a service that would be eliminated if the powers that be
> > would do the right thing.
> > David and Deb Ward wrote:
> > > In reading the part about not needing shelters is not the way to go. A
> > > good shelter, (the key word is "Good")is a first step for someone
> > > getting off the streets.
> > >
> > > Dave Ward
> > >
> > > bill.cannon wrote:
> > _______________________________________________