[HPN] 'Deadbeat Dad' Database Endangers Everyone (Commentary)

unclescam unclescam@buskers.org
Fri, 25 Feb 2000 21:55:03 -0500

Previous message: [HPN] 'Deadbeat Dad' Database Endangers Everyone (Commentary)
Next message: [HPN] Re: Dead beat Dads data base endangers us all!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

--------------9E49809AB04FF196D8A24AB3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit well bill i guess we should get outa the system. don'nt work over the table n don't take government money. if they give you anything yer on a list. can't use banks or star cards or even be on the internet another list n as the list is on a computer ,as all are, i think i wanna own that computer. nah, i'd have to get on a list. stay cool old boy. there's social security to retire on. i own that.. uncle scam everybodies uncle William Tinker wrote: > > > [Image] > April 30, 1998 > > 'Deadbeat Dad' Database Endangers Everyone > > by Doug Bandow > Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In a well-meaning effort to catch "deadbeat dads," Republicans added a measure to the '96 Welfare Reform Act to set up a national database that will catch everyone -- even those who aren't deadbeats or dads. The new system will certainly track down parents who don't pay child support. But the law, however effective, is a dangerous extension of federal power that will ultimately be misused. Congress shot a blunderbuss, with every working American a target. Hitting up deadbeat dads -- and deadbeat moms as the case may be -- would seem to hold great promise. Even if the amount of child support collected is small, the simple act of holding deadbeat dads liable should make them ponder more carefully their decision to have children. The problem of welfare is at bottom a problem of fathers. Children in female-headed households are more likely to live in poverty. Such families are more likely to collect public assistance. And men who aren't held responsible for fathering children are more likely to sire illegitimate children. The database idea has precedent. California passed a law in '92 requiring companies with five or more employees in 17 different industries to report all new hires within 30 days who are older than l8 and earn more than $300 a month. Firms had to include the workers' names and Social Security numbers. (So much for the old promise never to use Social Security numbers for anything other than Social Security.) ----------------------------------------------------------- People's privacy is already under assault at almost every turn. The deadbeat dad registry demonstrates yet again how it is government that most threatens our freedom. ----------------------------------------------------------- Coneress voted in '96 to take the California program national. Now all the states must create comparable systems. All companies must report the names and Social Security numbers of new hires and reported deadbeats, along with the date they started work, within 20 calendar days. Come May 1, states will also have to compare Social Security numbers of new hires and reported deadbeats. That's all well and good. But where in the Constitution does Washington get the power to order states to create employment databases? Congress is run by Republicans who regularly proclaim states' rights and inveigh against unfunded mandates Yet here they've passed a serious intrusion into states' rights and an enormous expansion of unfunded mandates. And is it appropriate to impose such a regulatory burden on private business? The cost may be modest compared to many other federal dictates. But the cumulative effect of these rules is immense A Federally mandated employment database is inconsistent with a free society. Government should not know where everyone in America works. Nor should government be able to track people as they change jobs. A truly limited national government of enumerated powers has no authority to force every company across the nation to turn in a list of its new employees. Knowledge of everyone's employment could be a powerful tool for social control. Once such a list exists, politicians will be tempted to expand its uses. Indeed, Congress ordered that the hiring data also be used to verify eligibility for other welfare programs, as well as for managing state employment security and workers' compensation programs. And lawmakers will be tempted to create other lists -- perhaps of people who purchase guns, contract serious diseases, attend particular schools, lose court judgments, run up bad debts and so on. All of them could serve one useful purpose or another. But all would pose a serious threat to freedom. People's privacy is already under assault at almost every turn. The deadbeat dad registry demonstrates yet again how it is government that most threatens our freedom. Congress should rescind the State Directory of New Hires. Repealing this law may cost the government some money. But our liberty is too precious to sell for a few pieces of silver. Today the list is being used for a good cause. Next time, the government's intention may not be so benign. (This article originally appeared in Investors Business Daily.) > [Image] > --------------9E49809AB04FF196D8A24AB3 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------31019C6C14558B15381C5661" --------------31019C6C14558B15381C5661 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> well bill i guess we should get outa the system. don'nt work over the table n don't take government money. if they give you anything yer on a list. can't use banks or star cards or even be on the internet another list n as the list is on a computer ,as all are, i think i wanna own that computer. nah, i'd have to get on a list. stay cool old boy. there's social security to retire on. i own that..
uncle scam
everybodies uncle

William Tinker wrote:

April 30, 1998
'Deadbeat Dad' Database Endangers Everyone
by Doug Bandow
Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute

In a well-meaning effort to catch "deadbeat dads," Republicans added a measure to the '96 Welfare Reform Act to set up a national database that will catch everyone -- even those who aren't deadbeats or dads.
The new system will certainly track down parents who don't pay child support. But the law, however effective, is a dangerous extension of federal power that will ultimately be misused. Congress shot a blunderbuss, with every working American a target.
Hitting up deadbeat dads -- and deadbeat moms as the case may be -- would seem to hold great promise. Even if the amount of child support collected is small, the simple act of holding deadbeat dads liable should make them ponder more carefully their decision to have children.
The problem of welfare is at bottom a problem of fathers. Children in female-headed households are more likely to live in poverty. Such families are more likely to collect public assistance. And men who aren't held responsible for fathering children are more likely to sire illegitimate children.
The database idea has precedent. California passed a law in '92 requiring companies with five or more employees in 17 different industries to report all new hires within 30 days who are older than l8 and earn more than $300 a month. Firms had to include the workers' names and Social Security numbers. (So much for the old promise never to use Social Security numbers for anything other than Social Security.)

People's privacy is already under assault at almost every turn. The deadbeat dad registry demonstrates yet again how it is government that most threatens our freedom.

Coneress voted in '96 to take the California program national. Now all the states must create comparable systems. All companies must report the names and Social Security numbers of new hires and reported deadbeats, along with the date they started work, within 20 calendar days. Come May 1, states will also have to compare Social Security numbers of new hires and reported deadbeats.
That's all well and good. But where in the Constitution does Washington get the power to order states to create employment databases?
Congress is run by Republicans who regularly proclaim states' rights and inveigh against unfunded mandates Yet here they've passed a serious intrusion into states' rights and an enormous expansion of unfunded mandates.
And is it appropriate to impose such a regulatory burden on private business? The cost may be modest compared to many other federal dictates. But the cumulative effect of these rules is immense
A Federally mandated employment database is inconsistent with a free society. Government should not know where everyone in America works. Nor should government be able to track people as they change jobs. A truly limited national government of enumerated powers has no authority to force every company across the nation to turn in a list of its new employees.
Knowledge of everyone's employment could be a powerful tool for social control. Once such a list exists, politicians will be tempted to expand its uses. Indeed, Congress ordered that the hiring data also be used to verify eligibility for other welfare programs, as well as for managing state employment security and workers' compensation programs. And lawmakers will be tempted to create other lists -- perhaps of people who purchase guns, contract serious diseases, attend particular schools, lose court judgments, run up bad debts and so on. All of them could serve one useful purpose or another. But all would pose a serious threat to freedom.
People's privacy is already under assault at almost every turn. The deadbeat dad registry demonstrates yet again how it is government that most threatens our freedom.
Congress should rescind the State Directory of New Hires. Repealing this law may cost the government some money. But our liberty is too precious to sell for a few pieces of silver.
Today the list is being used for a good cause. Next time, the government's intention may not be so benign.

(This article originally appeared in Investors Business Daily.)

In a well-meaning effort to catch "deadbeat dads," Republicans added a measure to the '96 Welfare Reform Act to set up a national database that will catch everyone -- even those who aren't deadbeats or dads. The new system will certainly track down parents who don't pay child support. But the law, however effective, is a dangerous extension of federal power that will ultimately be misused. Congress shot a blunderbuss, with every working American a target. Hitting up deadbeat dads -- and deadbeat moms as the case may be -- would seem to hold great promise. Even if the amount of child support collected is small, the simple act of holding deadbeat dads liable should make them ponder more carefully their decision to have children. The problem of welfare is at bottom a problem of fathers. Children in female-headed households are more likely to live in poverty. Such families are more likely to collect public assistance. And men who aren't held responsible for fathering children are more likely to sire illegitimate children. The database idea has precedent. California passed a law in '92 requiring companies with five or more employees in 17 different industries to report all new hires within 30 days who are older than l8 and earn more than $300 a month. Firms had to include the workers' names and Social Security numbers. (So much for the old promise never to use Social Security numbers for anything other than Social Security.) People's privacy is already under assault at almost every turn. The deadbeat dad registry demonstrates yet again how it is government that most threatens our freedom. Coneress voted in '96 to take the California program national. Now all the states must create comparable systems. All companies must report the names and Social Security numbers of new hires and reported deadbeats, along with the date they started work, within 20 calendar days. Come May 1, states will also have to compare Social Security numbers of new hires and reported deadbeats. That's all well and good. But where in the Constitution does Washington get the power to order states to create employment databases? Congress is run by Republicans who regularly proclaim states' rights and inveigh against unfunded mandates Yet here they've passed a serious intrusion into states' rights and an enormous expansion of unfunded mandates. And is it appropriate to impose such a regulatory burden on private business? The cost may be modest compared to many other federal dictates. But the cumulative effect of these rules is immense A Federally mandated employment database is inconsistent with a free society. Government should not know where everyone in America works. Nor should government be able to track people as they change jobs. A truly limited national government of enumerated powers has no authority to force every company across the nation to turn in a list of its new employees. Knowledge of everyone's employment could be a powerful tool for social control. Once such a list exists, politicians will be tempted to expand its uses. Indeed, Congress ordered that the hiring data also be used to verify eligibility for other welfare programs, as well as for managing state employment security and workers' compensation programs. And lawmakers will be tempted to create other lists -- perhaps of people who purchase guns, contract serious diseases, attend particular schools, lose court judgments, run up bad debts and so on. All of them could serve one useful purpose or another. But all would pose a serious threat to freedom. People's privacy is already under assault at almost every turn. The deadbeat dad registry demonstrates yet again how it is government that most threatens our freedom. Congress should rescind the State Directory of New Hires. Repealing this law may cost the government some money. But our liberty is too precious to sell for a few pieces of silver. Today the list is being used for a good cause. Next time, the government's intention may not be so benign. (This article originally appeared in Investors Business Daily.)

--------------31019C6C14558B15381C5661 Content-Type: image/gif Content-ID: <part1.38B74081.24198FC1@buskers.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="/Macintosh%20HD/Temporary%20Items/nsmail7.gif" R0lGODlhWQE7ALMAAAAAAAAIexgYGCkxhDE5a2NjlJyUrb21ztbO1ufe5+/n7/fv7/f3//// /////////ywAAAAAWQE7AAAE/rDJSau9OOvNu/9gKI5kaZ5oIxwLm75wLM90bd+4BghFseTA oHBILBpRgJ3r1Uocn9CodEoTJFepg4EAKByo4LB4POVeESaGQcAGHApOsnxOr5sK1isr7lEY AAR4B2wLCgQIP3aKi4x1BUmQPGgdCD1sbwUEbJaHiY2foKFEf5B6nhcJCGteAgZrawSahAWT ora3uCmkpUoYC7B4bAIJl2sCv8cInbnMzc4Zf3mlArUSxJmtBrSaBgeIyLDCBqfP5eaig2a8 KwmujwS/qgIEaywL9/eDwpf35/7/i7S04bXDSg9ux/AY+Ibvxz1j7Y6RA0ix4hQEg3ato+Yq gaxv/grwWfgVzIfFkyihIEAgjCCkAtpcjWvYz4JCQhNT6txJY0ECmNJc7kCQIKRIX/NU2ePJ tGmMfL+EnnEVkoMqYzOdat1KIkGCe4+kSqrZoIXJCR5j4eTKtq1Vnw0GiV3Rz6ewClhhknXL l6+aSiHDinWBqRXeVRL7KuabUdvKoC45snFFtpKyVnsXa27ao4ACPJqkRrKSlCxoPIg2q3ba iqifFaFFQ/rqaUErbzNztjjAu7fv38CDCx9OvLhx4asVA1goUSbkyFkndPuMOWeDnwOya9/O vbv37+DDix/v3SSmzujTw/yZ3oAGben51ICfvs559PKpEBtHn4dg0dRQ/sASPahlhlYBASSo 4IIMNujggxBGKOGEDhbAQAP/yUbAAQQRoIE6kHxxA4iQBKFMLCgW0EGGSYgYxisLsJSNJc8R hIUTGWlhQFUY/EThj0AGKSSEA3iGoWylbNjhhwS5WAOJSQTBIS8ecsCiG2Pws8B6XrlSo41b /MTSGkehgqCERbrimzbdBTDAguTFmR1MaxaQHZpGXimUklQyyYuTNEAJgJRLWukSoFJoI1EL 8HxFTEuyZXOMMQZS4COEdGKkYzfeaMpbD5UkSEtvMpVqKqfArYSqFt54hZGdRBq5hVqRpThl kn6WgqgMghLap6FNiuFlXVQJFAiSV0zGzwaX/jY4wEKvDkDAm26meYBXBzzbToIGpLKmmte6 KhwCCiigip13BuJFUQm8QS2DRSpQwa2lqDgBvUlUiQF9neU3Q69A4AvIioeKQS5mZYVD2xrI kuYTPBw0u+C6qrzrYJHnXpvtAFqAR0u5G3NHMawXf5yKARYnGO+8LtkrgcAEKHCek572lt+5 nV1rQq/t/uZEzbzdzK/OE8ishY02Z3Clxr8RdV41NzCASDcOLdAJPhwOFKkmPlh3YIMjU/hs D672gDKRRLXr4EK8TehFue2kvDIFAndBt41ISwCliwy37K8HvbKo4t7SfQnHy8juKsHSAmt9 Rg6VaPGVBD7BkU8m/sY0vJzXX8NJbqhim+1VuyQ/OEDaBjTYrRZnTnhAuX7Aa+TdBLkcF7JJ oEF4A4JO8zcHgdfOe7DDA4hj4kofWndk8t5gDFGJ6LMPD1tqJFtqzLbu5rWgA+kF92+giTqD cCDwZspEvq6AxHPf2zLtyHpIuPVCCTBC8LwMHiz9kd2OpOJHatLyXOKeG4wFewxrg0HAERsA AbBz2+sS+iTUDVqcDE3hSp2COBY7IX1MZu9qH+KE5z4bPUd+wYJSjZoHAvzVq3i6gmEkXGIu Wq0DRVCjAOMi874bwMQziPhJjTwjkx40LIcVaBYcUqE9sWkhAN1q1wQ3mMGJMXFI2urS/gZn V8L8wS8S/sMV4WwUwBiGwIUvkWGLGkBGFrkIZgQTYBtJaAN57GMHLXtDuZzzpUgsxUwKCle2 PBg+C3bvYlVU2esGOSRaFOIAW2ThCL3YRUh4CI5j7JMbRYDGJOjvT2zUJPHCaMk4/gmOgnPe a6aBB4K8wih0aZgXcnKpJcYtSM8aJMe0mD5eBuBjGsRit9Z3JhGSMo2VzNcxB5ZJXAnsgRjo pN2aWcpnJnNgwDrlklJpg2AkCSaRocs9ZpQ5sSDxOmda4iGd2Dp1NhFO4WpdFIPZyNFp0Jh1 sx0cMRksMtIPmheQ5idj6M9RwjGbukIlHWegAMd1wYi1gwmn/hKCmS04EJBQLBshQ6g+esLr Wp9J0Ia88k7vQe+eXJzkC695ySVRExKfGeUHBKpGLNFwkypVJkJDpFBK0oAlVLKNQ7vgE+k9 JDGtrF8OLyXIKZruiVY01xR3GdJfpq2kPxppB/HZw5wOjJ+gJCBOW+iSMqbxpUnQhkELtYEd itKnM8DXovjnGaP8pBOUAcs8akQNLXxtl1IMEi2ayMEOOiueorrqkKgIMpWldJl2Y+kyUQhK vqrnd7kqhVk9WdMvWDY+kt1pi3q60hlcJkkO6VspdkQTVHWrBeGQxTpmaQ0EmewABAhSN+Q2 TEgisijpHN9i3bSjrT42n19UJlhj/qgnLOysrKkkXHMVd9C2Km+bC41BA68Qi3ImiVxw84nM qJE2VRkDMmzAno+oykixqaJC5JLYBsFbzEQu9ll7dKwkIavPJS03RHozZwlourveDcUC1dWA W3HFTRmodhp7DScPINWae3grJjzQhGx7gc4Ehct83pPZqYJWFI+qzDVnGmm7cnvf4qJ0v8iV 7H/XKIEH/yoDRvON7qArvN01wMa4Si42rSvHt5YWBg0dTI3o4Qol5JUmhTAKPi7siklcahzm wqqDuLeSVK1PGc5SLHE1et/XXYqrC92nS2X6E6nYDsFrJshmp8lmPUXWq/pS8HWNjEwko1ca pHlOBRdF/hMKQLlqZSFLLe35IzhomYPbIl8Q22lPp0boEFLVL8vS7N84m1FAX8LsjKMUXZlK AKgu4UOCk1dkBmcXBRnyUALiV4hKlaCWQWxvhBZi6eLq2qqFaB1g19locgUTzXBVc5/2BjP+ FfACox5UqbVJJWeHlsjUdjVcYQ0ZAm23ZUaRQbOwTOwwmxhe7GriB7Vny7MJqVsg1rSQ7zzZ ejN7Sc95s5Apy4s5D5Sn+KbjqjGw4FI2GAUIABCSujYDJeba0lCMt8rQpz5dO7Kqivyylp/6 Czgdt6v1HjVvPN1nOC+bx16898l9OvALFFyZBzeBIXDnZlubQGLtjhDHfKsy/ndH9ZDrljSZ xbY6iyH7yMoWY6sN/mrJEnjpMBc4W/UM9YHFvARJpTneIOGeqwBUA+wbpnwnBvRfJwi8Pr/4 Oy14RQrRYp1HL3nSS6lybR9500qX87QTil2WT53V2Wb6tkkAZK0TUHpLGIF8tUVMREqcFueG 4voc7kuyj27jiSV23DkrY5KPtu9333dNpd3jqnuowXXrFrb5zmfO49gr65t87GHfR8NDmHqc i1hJTeZzUUUaY5EGW5RDtocs32li4SLdBDEWPmd9nNN9EnnjVNB0r9rvOfZL5XNGvg7q+93N gGe93Ut+Adubv36by73uH+QFopxrTq9D2boCK7vk/mOkyivpsjvgtRB2YWI7MFExpvN8ydZp K6crs7Z1oNQjNHd6PNQkCbgOBTMBoqFvE/ByVld9FGg2rZBhiqIQQME15zcN45ACY6cggdAN XcYbX0YqpeNx6hGD6HExKigudaJzBIh0Bph3MWRg07B6ooEG/CMUX+CDYEQBfWSBi7Nn4+d6 GAAI9NCBNyELgjA9IygVECMCJwgnRSKD2jFcQjIn6nF8sQJjIDd3ykQ4xBAp50QBRrgc1lB7 MbSGAAI1Q0hvFYCBDjh4FbAcrPAK3fAKG8IcWXeFLpGFIbCFYLiIjIiDFzJv/RV9nocl6GQ4 mFUBqGYj1ZCJyUI8QiQUXYeDYN+GhzrEhIIXen1YEHgUaNMzVIYYVOpnAYrYiLRYi0XyiFHA OmZDNCBAOrv4OzPjAbpIJ5dIBq94jJYUi7J4KszYjM74jNAYjdIIjcqYHHaAjMgID9XYABEA AAA7 --------------31019C6C14558B15381C5661 Content-Type: image/gif Content-ID: <part2.38B74081.24198FC1@buskers.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="menubar.gif" R0lGODlh0wETALMAAAAAABAQECEhIQAAhERERFhYeJmXnsnJyune5O/n7+/v7/fv9/f39//3 9//3/////ywAAAAA0wETAAAE/vDJSau9OOvNu/9gKI5kaZ5oqq5s61pDLM90bd94ru987//A oHBILBqPyKRyyTxiagWDVFooxKrYrDY6tTa/4LB4TC6bz+jyU8adShFu+PQgf9ffBm/sxe/7 /4CBgoOEhS1scHpWeAYEMwcNXgUHBjQGCQh6hpucnZ6foKGiG1cJBzcGCJmWDF5UNZcHXqO0 tba3uLmfMQatqJeVM72Lp6gMwR8EygcPB8oEns7PygYbjdAV1xLUJVIS18yEzgDkAtV+2iPT 3NbKD+B8BgLlBAm6IuUTBuR9AwWmbGZEGXCgmAwDCqxQsmGlAIJiH8gBYHZAYjSJGM9hIMCv AkcA/hLIYQuRYN65fRMJJcAoUeOLjyRYitwAE2W4Fh8xCrgXQmKBbx1fDKgWDFYlhHqGJnRY 1MaBBFYikqNoUUKCKfYemHo6RauUrF67fqhITl6+guHQPvhI6dK2jmrDfp1wFatXkcy2Zq3r VmtBvnvdgOWAUsCBeQBGCqa7uFlBKXkbf6x7s4NEZS0ltJ3rmJlNtPb0NpsDoiXKiVs3UwBs 9a9duX3l3nTttnFpiZ6DXiNw0pscZr81DH3HMI+/q8KgpmoKS0ElqYkbVT1dtplMxAAE2Dus 04JoCmRBhl/bcWbOcsxgPphZUud27GXD87P5jmU1sth3tpeovcJ3feVw/qYVfP1xlxF5iF1C oD0fYeeSX09ZgBt5idXnHoUWUlKdTdQB8GBnFiDG22wyYdPhfeXwN+CFBs60HkYtVrfaXxhg FAAcHZ1XYQEABGDhTighIBxRNkhx0CoxPBWFczkg9JwHMlm0UnYGmhLgZQk+MI85KD1IH3gt IbaTeuaJVBiGL0LzkRQzmcVmYgYKAI1NUxqGmJXZmTVRl20NlqEFOtZD4ZtzmoSSmvQksOah FMrp4gRkfTghowQIwGV1NU3VHqI75QOZhBVWEKM51uWJ2FPo3Ymfnhp62KeWea75YmIEREqZ qDKCWkAA0fFDFjQ8TkTWOFNxtNOQxMGy2QFM/iYJFVNNrgKdnNhZSFR8mJKDpwG/EprNVLjK VA2ZFaoHE7nQ5NMMWHWJWOpJU3VpbaQZhifnh1+KKl0+AZp1bLtlpvTisRFSaM+jmuU6waQu UlJptiDRx1Z12CnjZ5oXXPXwVPR2KS+fG3LMH2/vajWTuvvd6ye9F2Db43z0ZDlPsOQE+2EF wxnEBhVYPCQDswohWSREUII7Hn2R0gtT0vQ88+B/CYvEDrponltehQgD1WuFLHNotMvXptSI g/7RSME1YYPU9DMW8hbwwqFSQPWMBVMwobtbuu0hhkiLpK1XOfUHXkH+PWNPgvRG2rerIYu9 MeN7Y/yoM/mVXXcF/o3DDEAb3D5AcwDUXYzzAAhAZQlzwDi7SLM2wLFH0SmN9yuFBUH8bp2s dTCeR2VR6vKYV0NzaklyDtx2yfUGXPven3015UjWBCgmrNq1xYynb0swvKWIgoQx7JbiZqus mQpcsV/esNVByqdxW46iLne/fNiPXfJ8e9rJ6yJl+/UUeU6lqhU1GPAABPjEgDXjAC8YoLOh VMFI/miWkvxBB+bwwiDQoUqOWAINpfkqc+/zwO7OppNyiQtNM5EPxUoIjSll50+BKpnXspOl 9cGnOipMCYFM6L1SHWhuljmhC7Njuy+1b0WJUVcHOvTCHPYnhh2LVzmy1KH+NGyKCgvi5jkQ wCvv0SxXp4KVwITDCwcUxUiT0MMED9CKhnDFEs7wxwA+YBe+6MNpVvlUV261FqeJDgN2tADa uuIGdohFLA5bhlWcdki2veodeAwLReaym1qBQGPUAIs0FKkVRnpDLJrZTTgO6Q0PuEFAm1RN Vx5pvDz6EQSbJFkADXdHdtzqVZWczSvfUcpmTONmGyiIkCTwkNmQZgLFJCbhFHgk60HmjBXk lhwakorNvEIGPMmmNrdpAinIqg8s4+YuTueGpGjhClXYmRtqIM52uvOdWsvOH1UQTngWIg1z tKc+93mLuPDznxEAADs= --------------31019C6C14558B15381C5661-- --------------9E49809AB04FF196D8A24AB3--

Previous message: [HPN] 'Deadbeat Dad' Database Endangers Everyone (Commentary)
Next message: [HPN] Re: Dead beat Dads data base endangers us all!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]